| Following is a first-hand account of an Operation known
as Flying Finn, which at the time ( Jan 5-7, 1970) was
the largest ground action in-country. Two companies of 2/5 lost a
total of 7 U.S. KIA. With the rest of the battalion engaged, Lean
Apache was responsible for base security on both LZs (IKE and
BARBARA). Intelligence thought it possible that one or both would
take ground attacks, so Apache was spread thin. LZ Barbara had an
even larger perimeter than IKE, and one company would have played
hell defending both against simultaneous ground attacks. Luckily for
us, that did not happen.
This information came to me via email from COL John Witherell (RET)
who at the time was the Battalion Commander. I asked him for his
recollections of Operation Flying Finn and his comments
were absolutely dead-on. His other observations, regarding what
the battalion did after Tay Ninh; and especially how all of us old
soldiers view the situation in Iraq today are certainly in
sync with my own feelings; and my guess
most of yours as
well.
Steve Watts (69-70)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email from COL John Witherell (RET)
Steve,
Recollections of old soldiers are always interesting and usually
in the ball park. Military historians have commented frequently
on the seeming disagreements among survivors of a battle about what
really happened. As for Flying Finn, Major Hamilton took a few days
to collect information from all sources and to make sense of the
battle. The records in the TOC were undoubtedly a major source in
his report and I presume you played a part. The report was quite
thorough and helped bring some consolation for the considerable
losses we suffered. It was the major battle in-country at the time
and the enemy suffered terribly from our units and, in particular,
the tactical air sorties and B-52 raids.
You were correct to remember January 5, the day the battle started.
We had moved most of the battalion to an area north of Ike near
the Mustang trail in response to indications of enemy activity (possibly
building up for Tet). A so-called "double check 6" (radio
intercept) message gave us a clue about where we would find the
enemy: about 5 miles north of Ike. We had several platoons in the
area and ordered the Recon Plat to assault into a triangular clearing
adjacent to the signal location before noon. Platoons of D Co were
also inserted in other clearings at about the same time. The point
element of Recon was engaged in early afternoon, losing three men
at the outset, with the remainder of the platoon pinned down. D
Co platoons also came into contact at the same hour. The rest of
the day was spent in trying to get Recon loose and bringing in B
and C companies. B made a combat assault late in the day and nearly
linked up with Recon, but couldn't disengage it. We also had a medevac
chopper shot down, losing two men in the crash. Tough night for
all units. We used a lot of artillery through the night to seal
off escape routes
The next day (6 Jan) we got all our units separated from the enemy,
which turned out to be the 2nd Bn of the 95C Regt, possibly 250
strong. We spent the day putting in tactical air strikes and then
tried to sweep through the area. Ran into resistance again, so stopped
the attacks, put in more tactical air strikes and got ready for
B-52 strikes the next day. There were many secondary explosions,
indicating a considerable ammo storage. We pulled out our units
the next morning (7 Jan) to an open area near Ike and put in two
separate B-52 strikes. They finished off any resistance and B and
D were re-inserted to sweep through the bunker complex in late afternoon.
They completed the sweep the following morning, finding total destruction
and many bodies, weapons, ammo and destroyed bunkers. We lost 7
killed and had many wounded.
Looking back, we were following the tactics of the war: find, fix,
fight and finish. In this instance we overdid the finding by getting
too tied down initially, but all units then performed well; the
air support was decisive to fighting and finishing and the artillery
helped to keep the enemy in place by sealing off escape to the northwest.
Your old company had the task of securing Barbara and Ike from attack
by other enemy forces (intelligence indicated that possibility).
The move to Loc Ninh came as a surprise -- we moved the same morning
we got the order. We worked with the 11th Armd Cav Regt there in
quite a different setting from War Zone C. Our C Co got hit the
first night, wounding the commander and making it necessary to replace
him quickly. That was when Lt Brace took over the company. Capt.
Carrier (D Co) was an outstanding field soldier and later went on
to command the 1st Cav Div Ranger Co. Capt. Jones later worked for
me at II Field Force Hq in the plans shop. We were there for the
Cambodian operation in May-June 1970. That operation gave MACV and
the VN forces a six-month breathing spell that allowed us to continue
the US forces draw-down and ARVN forces to get control of the country.
Quite a setback for VC and NVN forces. It was a very controversial
back home, but militarily was a sound and positive move.
You are probably comparing your experience with what is going on
in Iraq. I think all of us are doing the same, trying to understand
how the troops and units are handling their tasks and missions.
We can only wish them well and admire them for their actions. They
have a difficult situation to say the least.
Finally, my so-called diaries reflect only the details of the day
-- who I saw, things to do or check, what to plan, promotions, problems,
training needs --but no reflections on the war. They are also hard
to decipher, I'm sorry to say -- much of it consists of cryptic
notes written while in the air. The Flying Finn days are forever
etched in my mind, however, and the foregoing is a reasonable account.
Your query has indeed rekindled a great many memories.
Again, my best wishes to you and yours, Jack Witherell
|